The Real Story Behind Peter Steinberg’s SGC Exit

Peter Steinberg (left) and Ryan Hoge (right)

Leaders don’t walk away on a whim. No, it’s rarely a sudden call—more often, it’s a slow burn fueled by months of boardroom meetings, shifting operations, and a vision built over years that suddenly starts to unravel. And when it comes to Peter Steinberg, the face of SGC for the past seven years, his resignation isn’t just a headline—it's a reflection of what happens when massive corporate decisions, fueled by industry giants like PSA and Collectors, collide with personal legacy.

This morning, fans and collectors are asking: what really caused Peter to step down? His farewell post was polished, heartfelt, and filled with gratitude for the journey. But behind the veneer lies the question that many are hesitant to ask—the truth about what’s next for SGC, and how much of Peter’s vision was sidelined along the way. Meantime, Ryan Hoge (PSA President) was heard in an interview this morning answering few questions about Peter and SGC's future.

Let’s rewind and decode this story into clear chapters because the issues are complex—and the stakes are high.

1. The Acquisition and Its Aftermath (February 2024)

When Collectors bought SGC in early 2024, the plan seemed simple: operate as a separate brand while sharing resources. But behind the scenes, it was clear that scaling the operation without massive investment was a struggle. Despite pouring millions into PSA and its own brand after the 2022 funding round, the capital and technology infusion didn’t trickle down to SGC. Instead, PSA (and by extension, Collectors) decided that having two mega-sized grading hubs made no sense. And Peter? He started as an employee, climbed the ranks, and worked tirelessly to build SGC into a powerhouse. Watching all that effort get pushed aside by capital-driven decisions? That’s a bitter pill.

2. The Shift Toward Boutique

Simultaneously, the parent company is pushing SGC toward what they call a “boutique” model—think exclusive, vintage, and more personalized service. The idea? Shrink the big operation, cut costs, and focus on a more selective, quality-driven approach. But here’s the rub: SGC had been pushing hard to grow into the modern era, to compete with the big boys on volume and scale. Now, that vision is being put on pause. The question becomes: is this just a strategic retrenchment, or a quiet sidelining?

3. Years of Leadership — And a Well-Deserved Break

Let’s not forget—Peter is human. After seven years of pushing, fighting, and working endless hours as a leader to elevate SGC, the weight of constant change and industry pressure can wear even the best down. Resignation isn’t just about the company line; it’s about a man needing space to breathe, reflect, and recharge. And honestly, it’s a healthy reminder—leadership is as much about endurance as vision.

And from the looks of it, PSA and Collectors’ decision to cut back and reallocate resources have left Peter’s efforts feeling almost futile. They may have offered him quick fixes or immediate options, but for now, he’s chosen to step away. Business-wise, it was certainly not a difficult decision to convince investors to continue funnelling resources towards PSA, as they have already graded around 9 million items this year—an 18% increase year over year.

Still, fate isn’t writing his story in stone. As Peter himself said in his farewell letter:"While I am not yet sure what the next chapter holds for me, I know my passion for cards and collecting will continue to drive me."  

So, stay tuned. Because if there’s one thing we know about Peter—he’s just getting started, and you might see him again in the grading industry.